| Pages: [1] |
1. BPO distinction idea. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Signed Thundercat, I couldn't agree more. We are supposed to be playing a game and having fun. Not acting like solicitors and accountants pawing over a document's fine print.
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.10.02 07:17:00
|
2. KAMAKAZI -making small ships effective in capital combat- - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
At first I thought "no way". Why should a day old alt be able to take out a player who has taken years to get his skills and isk together to buy and fly a Titan. In real life a suicide bomber gives up his life to destroy his target. In Eve that i...
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.09.25 12:24:00
|
3. POSs: Flogging the Dead Horse - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jinx, sorry if I gave the wrong impression. I didn't mean that creating the new system would be a headache, I meant that converting the tens of thousands of existing POSes across to the new style would be difficult. So, I thought if we took that ...
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.09.20 00:32:00
|
4. POSs: Flogging the Dead Horse - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
After further thought I would think that the change over from the current POS types to the new ones suggested here would be the major headache for CCP. So, I would suggest that we keep the current POS setup and bring in the suggestions by Evelgrin...
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.09.19 09:47:00
|
5. POSs: Flogging the Dead Horse - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I have been playing the game for 18 months, but only just started making use of the forums. This is a great thread and I am amazed beyond belief that a Dev has not made a single utterance. CCP, how can a thread last this long with SO much player...
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.09.19 06:27:00
|
6. Capital ships for miners coming, new Dev Blog by Chronotis - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Amateratsu Edited by: Amateratsu on 28/08/2007 08:02:02 Originally by: Lougra My mining director the last week finished the warfare link specialist skill at lvl 5. The total benefit from it in ore mining was on...
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.08.28 08:37:00
|
7. Capital ships for miners coming, new Dev Blog by Chronotis - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Quote: And for the rest : its a capital ship - dont use it unsupported. Hmmm.... Wasn't the original concept for this thing to take 4 or 5 miners out into the field and support them? Or why give it a clone bay? After the initial 30 sec...
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.08.24 05:33:00
|
8. Capital ships for miners coming, new Dev Blog by Chronotis - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This baby needs to be able to defend itself to a greater degree, but at the same time not become a warefare capital. I would suggest giving it the ability to "deal" with a hostile gang of 5 or 6 that find the miners in a belt. If the Rorqual had...
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.08.24 02:00:00
|
9. Capital ships for miners coming, new Dev Blog by Chronotis - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Well ByF, here's the logic that you seem unwilling to grasp. The Hulk pilots in my corp are much closer to being able to fly the Rorqual than my Alt character who is a mining director. If one of the Hulk pilots changes over to fly the Rorqual tha...
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.08.23 04:44:00
|
10. Capital ships for miners coming, new Dev Blog by Chronotis - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
My main character is a Mining Director. This ship should be aimed at Mining Directors not Hulk pilots. It is a waste of time and skills to fly this ship if you are a Hulk pilot. CCP, get rid of the Mining Barge V skill requirement. That is just t...
- by Nicely Dunn - at 2007.08.22 11:30:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |